Every prospect and every contact, on one board.
The sheet you already keep becomes the board: compare recruits side by side, and log every call, text and visit against the NCAA calendar — flagged automatically when one falls outside a window.
No signup for the demo · fictional sample program
Tap a name to focus their column
Flagged automatically — no one has to remember to check
Your board is a spreadsheet. Your budget is another one. Neither knows what an offer costs you.
Drop in the recruiting sheet you already keep — any spreadsheet, image, PDF, or Excel file — and the board builds itself, read, matched, and priced in seconds.
- 1Your spreadsheet
- 2Organized recruits
- 3Ready to evaluate
How it gets there
Real screen recording of a 100-player upload — not a mockup. Full app window, no narration.
What it does, in order.
- 01
Upload the sheet you already keep
Names, positions, class years, and whatever stats or measurables are in the file are read in and matched. Unmatched rows are created for you to confirm. The homepage's 100-player upload is a real recording of that step, not a mock.
- 02
Compare, side by side
Pick two or more prospects and see their lines in one view — measurables, stats by season, academics, signing risk — with the demo's two catchers as the worked example. Tap a name to focus a column.
- 03
The contact log, against the calendar
Every call, text, visit and offer is logged with who made it and when, then checked against the contact gate for that prospect's division and class year. An entry outside a window is flagged on the spot. The flags are informational and carry the NCAA disclaimer; your compliance office keeps the final word.
- 04
Staff see what you grant
Assistants are invited by the head coach and see the categories they are given — Finances, Compliance, Recruiting, Events, Grading — so a volunteer coach can work the board without ever seeing the budget.
- 05
Players can share in
A player can send their own profile to your program directly; it lands on the board with its stats, video and academics, attributed to the player. Nothing is scraped and Sightline never contacts a recruit on your behalf.
The rest of the workspace it touches.
Real screens from the same product, not illustrations. Each one is here because it proves something this page claims.
The board is not a spreadsheet: every prospect on it carries the engine's range, suggested allocation and risk read.
- Suggested allocation
- $6.5K
- Below the estimate on purpose: $93K of a $1.9M pool is uncommitted, with four other catchers still in play.
- Planned offer
- $15.5K
- −$0.5K vs. estimate — $13K scholarship + $2.5K institutional NIL.
- Price vs. what's leftThe offer as a share of remaining budget
- Your talent gradeCoach-entered grades and Looks, never a model's
- What's on fileStats, measurables, video, injuries, transcripts
- Academics + eligibilityCore GPA against the NCAA line, eligibility clock
The score and each factor's direction are on his demo profile, computed live. Also on the board: Silas Rutherford, C, a year further out — projected $9.5K–$28K at signing, no offer yet.
Which positions the board is actually recruiting for, by season, so the class and the roster stay one conversation.
- # projected players
- Need vs. target
- Critical vs. target
- Strong vs. target
C is below target in 2026–27. The projection assumes every eligible player stays and every commit signs — stated on the screen, not hidden in the math.
Questions coaches ask about this.
Built for the stands, not just the desk.
Scout from the stands, one-handed. Three taps and a dated look is in the prospect's evaluation history — and his signing-risk read already knows.
