Every dollar tied to a roster spot.
Set the pool, allocate scholarship and institutional NIL by prospect, and see committed, pending and remaining at a glance — with the same figures feeding cash flow, scenarios, and the pay-versus-output read on your current roster.
No signup for the demo · fictional sample program
Same budget as the demo. Sliding a new offer moves what's left into pending; the demo counts an offer as committed the moment it goes out. Nothing is sent or saved.
$28,950 remaining after this offer.
Upload season stats and see, in plain terms, whether pay and production line up for every player on your current roster.
Team batting average climbing across the season — a sign contact quality is trending the right way before conference play.
Scored 0–100 against real programs at your level — Defense is where the next roster spot should go.
What it does, in order.
- 01
One pool, three states
Scholarship and institutional NIL sit in one program-wide pool. A commitment or an offer out counts as committed the moment it exists; a prospect you are merely considering is pending; remaining is what is left after both. The demo's budget on the homepage is that exact rule on the sample program.
- 02
Allocate by prospect
Each recruit carries a planned scholarship and NIL figure alongside the engine's suggested allocation, so the gap is visible on the board and on the profile. Change an offer and the pool, the class snapshot and the Command Center all move together.
- 03
Cash flow and scenarios
A multi-year projection of what the current roster and the committed class cost by season, and a scenario sandbox for what changes if a recruit signs, a player leaves, or a renewal comes in higher. Nothing in a scenario touches the real board until you apply it.
- 04
Pay versus output
Upload season stats and see, in plain terms, whether pay and production line up for every player on the roster — the flag for a renewal conversation, and for where freed money could go.
- 05
Team strength, by category
Team stats uploaded through the season become a four-category strength profile — hitting, pitching, defense, baserunning — scored against the real population at your level, so the next roster spot goes where the team is actually thin.
The rest of the workspace it touches.
Real screens from the same product, not illustrations. Each one is here because it proves something this page claims.
Where the money should go next: projected depth by position and season, from the same engine the Command Center uses.
- # projected players
- Need vs. target
- Critical vs. target
- Strong vs. target
C is below target in 2026–27. The projection assumes every eligible player stays and every commit signs — stated on the screen, not hidden in the math.
Why the strength profile is level-aware. A 5.50 team ERA is below-average Power-4 and above-average almost everywhere else.
The same picture from the pitching side. A 5.50 team ERA is a below-average Power-4 staff and an above-average one almost anywhere else — the single clearest reason a recruiting board needs level-aware benchmarks.
The numbers this stands on.
Questions coaches ask about this.
Every prospect and every contact, on one board.
The sheet you already keep becomes the board: compare recruits side by side, and log every call, text and visit against the NCAA calendar — flagged automatically when one falls outside a window.